Hey, here's a crazy idea. What if we're not all as different ideologically as we seem, we just got mixed up on application of ideas?
If a thing is too fragile to survive (e.g., might not survive its own inherent flaws, though may be in the greater interest to help it along...meddling, as it were.), given that we have the power to intervene, should we?
Would you answer differently if the topic was "Government Intervention/Regulation v. Free Markets" or "Creationism v. Evolution"?